The world is urbanising fast. By 2050, the number of people living in cities is likely to increase to more than 6 billion, or almost three-quarters of the world’s population. This rate is almost the equivalent of adding a new city the size of Singapore every month. Such rapid growth presents economic opportunities. At the same time, it will also place enormous strain on the systems and resources that are essential for our shared wellbeing and prosperity.

“Urbanisation is one of the great social phenomena of our age,” said Jeremy Bentham, Shell’s Vice President, Global Business Environment. “How cities around the world develop in coming decades will determine how efficiently we use vital resources – particularly energy, food and water – and directly impact the quality of life for billions of future urban citizens.”

In its latest publication launched today, Shell’s Scenarios team explores the energy implications of urbanisation. The report looks at different types of cities, how they may evolve and the conditions which shape how well they adapt and reform to external change. A chapter on Singapore, co-authored with Singapore’s Centre for Liveable Cities (CLC), shows Singapore’s journey to become a densely populated and liveable city through good governance and urban planning. It also explores what factors enable cities to have room to manoeuvre, instead of being caught in a trapped transition.

“While every city is different, some guiding principles of ideal development exist, such as increasing compactness and more efficient integration of transport, power and heating systems,” said Bentham. “For example, our research shows that compact city design can typically reduce average car use nationally by as much as 2,000 kilometres per person annually compared to countries with low density development common in many parts of the world today.”

The publication, New Lenses on Future Cities, is the first in a series of supplements to the New Lens Scenarios published by Shell in March 2013. Both Shell and CLC recognise that while there are challenges of urbanisation, opportunities are also plentiful in cities that want to become more liveable, sustainable and competitive. In 2012, Shell and CLC signed a three-year memorandum of understanding to collaborate on research, publications and events on urban management and solutions. This publication is the culmination of the joint research collaboration, during which CLC shared its knowledge, particularly about Singapore’s development experience.

CLC shared insights from Singapore’s journey of recent decades in urban planning, transport and housing in the chapter on Singapore.  For example, the Housing and Development Board (HDB) was set up in 1960 with a strong mandate to aggressively tackle the problems of housing that resulted in slum and squatter areas. Red tape was slashed and government made funding available. Strong land acquisition laws and powers of resettlement assisted the task. HDB also promoted home ownership and the integration of different ethnic and income groups. Today, some 82% of Singapore’s citizens and permanent residents live in public housing which is well-integrated with nearby jobs, schools, public transport, parks and other amenities.

Acting Director of CLC, Mr Julian Goh, said, “Singapore’s experience in urban development has shown that dynamic urban governance and integrated master planning and development are important for cites to develop room to manoeuvre.”

The publication, New Lenses on Future Cities, also describes the opportunities for different types of cities to develop resource-efficiency. New cities, or city districts, still to be built can be engineered from the outset to a compact integrated ideal. For older cities where design is already hard-wired, existing infrastructure may make ideal development impractical and excessively costly. Well targeted and affordable retrofitting will help. Rather than continuing to spread the city boundary as the population grows, planning authorities could use planning regulations and incentives to encourage and prioritise infilling of existing infrastructure and districts, so that they become progressively more densely populated, to absorb future growth.

The other challenge to ideal development is that residents simply may resist it.  Indeed, the cities often thought of as most attractive are prosperous with relatively low population density, reflecting the desirability of “having it all”: proximity to other people and city amenities, while retaining plenty of personal private space, such as detached houses with gardens. But increasing density does not necessarily decrease liveability. Singapore, London, Tokyo are examples of higher density cities with high liveability scores. As global resource stresses increase, social preferences and expectations may change and it is possible that resource efficiency (and hence city compactness) will begin to feature more significantly as a component of city attractiveness and liveability.

Related Links:


New Lenses on Future Cities is available via

About Shell Scenarios

Shell Scenarios ask “what if?” questions to explore alternative views of the future and create plausible stories around them. They consider long-term trends in economics, energy supply and demand, geopolitical shifts and social change, as well as the motivating factors that drive change. In doing so, they help build visions of the future. Shell’s latest New Lens Scenarios were published in 2013.

About Centre for Liveable Cities

Set up in 2008 by Singapore’s Ministry of National Development and Ministry of the Environment and Water Resources, the Centre for Liveable Cities (CLC) has as its mission “to distil, create and share knowledge on liveable and sustainable cities”. CLC’s work spans three main areas – Research, Capability Development and Promotion. Through these activities, CLC hopes to provide urban leaders and practitioners with the knowledge and support needed to make our cities better.


Serene Loo, Shell Spokesperson (Asia Pacific)

Tricia Chiu

Cautionary Note

The companies in which Royal Dutch Shell plc directly and indirectly owns investments are separate entities. In this press release “Shell”, “Shell group” and “Royal Dutch Shell” are sometimes used for convenience where references are made to Royal Dutch Shell plc and its subsidiaries in general. Likewise, the words “we”, “us” and “our” are also used to refer to subsidiaries in general or to those who work for them. These expressions are also used where no useful purpose is served by identifying the particular company or companies. ‘‘Subsidiaries’’, “Shell subsidiaries” and “Shell companies” as used in this press release refer to companies over which Royal Dutch Shell plc  either directly or indirectly has control. Companies over which Shell has joint control are generally referred to “joint ventures” and companies over which Shell has significant influence but neither control nor joint control are referred to as “associates”. In this press release, joint ventures and associates may also be referred to as “equity-accounted investments”. The term “Shell interest” is used for convenience to indicate the direct and/or indirect (for example, through our 23% shareholding in Woodside Petroleum Ltd.) ownership interest held by Shell in a venture, partnership or company, after exclusion of all third-party interest.

This press release contains forward-looking statements concerning the financial condition, results of operations and businesses of Royal Dutch Shell. All statements other than statements of historical fact are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are statements of future expectations that are based on management’s current expectations and assumptions and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results, performance or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied in these statements.

Forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements concerning the potential exposure of Royal Dutch Shell to market risks and statements expressing management’s expectations, beliefs, estimates, forecasts, projections and assumptions. These forward-looking statements are identified by their use of terms and phrases such as ‘‘anticipate’’, ‘‘believe’’, ‘‘could’’, ‘‘estimate’’, ‘‘expect’’, ‘‘goals’’, ‘‘intend’’, ‘‘may’’, ‘‘objectives’’, ‘‘outlook’’, ‘‘plan’’, ‘‘probably’’, ‘‘project’’, ‘‘risks’’, “schedule”, ‘‘seek’’, ‘‘should’’, ‘‘target’’, ‘‘will’’ and similar terms and phrases. There are a number of factors that could affect the future operations of Royal Dutch Shell and could cause those results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements included in this press release, including (without limitation): (a) price fluctuations in crude oil and natural gas; (b) changes in demand for Shell’s products; (c) currency fluctuations; (d) drilling and production results; (e) reserves estimates; (f) loss of market share and industry competition; (g) environmental and physical risks; (h) risks associated with the identification of suitable potential acquisition properties and targets, and successful negotiation and completion of such transactions; (i) the risk of doing business in developing countries and countries subject to international sanctions; (j) legislative, fiscal and regulatory developments including regulatory measures addressing climate change; (k) economic and financial market conditions in various countries and regions; (l) political risks, including the risks of expropriation and renegotiation of the terms of contracts with governmental entities, delays or advancements in the approval of projects and delays in the reimbursement for shared costs; and (m) changes in trading conditions. All forward-looking statements contained in this press release are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section. Readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Additional risk factors that may affect future results are contained in Royal Dutch Shell’s 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 (available at and ). These risk factors also expressly qualify all forward looking statements contained in this press release and should be considered by the reader.  Each forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of this press release 14 January 2014. Neither Royal Dutch Shell plc nor any of its subsidiaries undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement as a result of new information, future events or other information. In light of these risks, results could differ materially from those stated, implied or inferred from the forward-looking statements contained in this press release.

We may have used certain terms, such as resources, in this press release that United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) strictly prohibits us from including in our filings with the SEC.  U.S. Investors are urged to consider closely the disclosure in our Form 20-F, File No 1-32575, available on the SEC website You can also obtain these forms from the SEC by calling 1-800-SEC-0330.