Collaboration and Personal Responsibility seen as ways to address the energy challenges

According to the United Nations and Shell Scenarios**, it is estimated that by 2030, the world will need 40 –50% more energy, water and food to keep up with rising demand and increased population growth. Tremendous stresses will therefore be placed on these vital resources as energy is used to move and treat water; water is required to produce energy and both energy and water are required in the production of food. These stresses underscore a complex relationship and it is worth noting that at least 7 out of 10# Singapore respondents see higher energy prices, energy and water shortages as having the greatest impact on Singapore in the future.

Lee Tzu Yang, Chairman of Shell Companies in Singapore, commented, “It is encouraging that many respondents in Singapore view future energy needs as high priority and are increasingly aware of the inter-dependence of food-water-energy. In order to meet these pressing needs, the world will have to use innovation and technology to mobilise multiple forms of energy over the coming decades.”

The survey also revealed that Singapore respondents are in favour of a mix of energy sources to help meet future energy demand. There is no single solution and solar energy (86%^) was the preferred option. This is followed by natural gas (52%^), a cleaner-burning ally to renewable energy, wind power (47%^) and hydro energy (42%).

Dr Gillian Koh, Senior Research Fellow of the Institute of Policy Studies, commented on the respondents’ preference for renewable energy, “It is probably more practical to consider the importation of natural gas, as our government has now taken steps to do and also to wait till solar cells are able to get around the hurdle of our enormous cloud cover and become much cheaper than they currently are. It is also clear from the survey that the public’s concern about energy rests on two main stools – one to do with how it contributes to the cost of living and the second to climate change. “

A large majority (92%) of respondents agree that it is important to reduce carbon dioxide emissions and many have indicated that they are already taking personal actions to do so. 80%^ of respondents indicate they are already using less energy such as by switching off the lights when they go out of a room and 77%^ of respondents practice recycling.

When asked who is responsible for finding energy solutions, around 42% of the Singapore respondents say they support greater collaboration between industry, government and community. Although a majority also said that the Government has the biggest role to play, it is the older respondents (above 40 years old) who think that effective government policy is more important, while the younger respondents (below 40 years old) believe that economic incentives for clean energy and innovation are the more important factors in developing future energy solutions.

“Strong, co-ordinated and proactive policies are essential if we aim to meet the world’s rising energy needs and safeguard the environment for future generations. Industry, government and society – all have a joint responsibility to create a better energy future,” Mr Lee added.

Survey Highlights:

  • 4 in 5# rate future energy needs as important. The top issues include cost of living (88%)#, employment/job security (86%)# and housing affordability (86%)#.
  • Higher energy prices (79%)#, energy shortages (75%)# and water shortages (72%)# are seen as having the greatest impact on Singapore in the future.
  • Solar energy (86%)^, gas (52%)^ and wind power (47%)^ are among the most preferred future energy sources for Singapore respondents.
  • 92%* consider reducing carbon dioxide emissions important.
  • 42% believe collaboration between industry, government and community is the most important factor in building future energy solutions.
  • More younger respondents (below 40 years old) believe that economic incentives for clean energy (31%) and innovation (16%) are the most important factors in building future energy solutions, while older respondents (above 40 years old) think that effective government policy (20%) is most important.

A full report of the Shell Future Energy Survey results can be downloaded from


Serene Loo, Shell Spokesperson (Asia Pacific)

+65 63848943/

Notes To Editors:

About the Survey

Shell commissioned Ipsos to produce the “Future Energy Survey” in Singapore to assess Singapore respondents’ views on the future of energy. Approximately 400 participants took part in the survey in March 2013.

About the Research Statistics

#This percentage refers to an individual category rating of 8 or above out of 10 on importance.

^This question was asked as a multiple response question, and accordingly responses will not total 100%.

*This percentage refers to an individual category rating of 6 or above out of 10 on importance.

**About Shell Scenarios (

Shell Scenarios ask “what if?” questions to explore alternative views of the future and create plausible stories around them. They consider long-term trends in economics, energy supply and demand, geopolitical shifts and social change, as well as the motivating factors that drive change. In doing so, they help build visions of the future. Shell’s latest New Lens Scenarios were published in 2013.

Dr. KHONG Cho-Oon, Shell’s Chief Political Analyst, will be delivering a public lecture on the Shell Global Scenarios 2013 titled “Viewing our Future with a ‘New Lens” in Singapore on 7 June 2013, at 9.30am – 11.30am, at Pan Pacific Hotel. Please visit for more information about the lecture.

Cautionary Note

The companies in which Royal Dutch Shell plc directly and indirectly owns investments are separate entities. In this press release “Shell”, “Shell group” and “Royal Dutch Shell” are sometimes used for convenience where references are made to Royal Dutch Shell plc and its subsidiaries in general. Likewise, the words “we”, “us” and “our” are also used to refer to subsidiaries in general or to those who work for them. These expressions are also used where no useful purpose is served by identifying the particular company or companies. ‘‘Subsidiaries’’, “Shell subsidiaries” and “Shell companies” as used in this press release refer to companies over which Royal Dutch Shell plc  either directly or indirectly has control. Companies over which Shell has joint control are generally referred to “joint ventures” and companies over which Shell has significant influence but neither control nor joint control are referred to as “associates”. In this press release, joint ventures and associates may also be referred to as “equity-accounted investments”. The term “Shell interest” is used for convenience to indicate the direct and/or indirect (for example, through our 23% shareholding in Woodside Petroleum Ltd.) ownership interest held by Shell in a venture, partnership or company, after exclusion of all third-party interest.

This press release contains forward-looking statements concerning the financial condition, results of operations and businesses of Royal Dutch Shell. All statements other than statements of historical fact are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are statements of future expectations that are based on management’s current expectations and assumptions and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results, performance or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied in these statements. Forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements concerning the potential exposure of Royal Dutch Shell to market risks and statements expressing management’s expectations, beliefs, estimates, forecasts, projections and assumptions. These forward-looking statements are identified by their use of terms and phrases such as ‘‘anticipate’’, ‘‘believe’’, ‘‘could’’, ‘‘estimate’’, ‘‘expect’’, ‘‘goals’’, ‘‘intend’’, ‘‘may’’, ‘‘objectives’’, ‘‘outlook’’, ‘‘plan’’, ‘‘probably’’, ‘‘project’’, ‘‘risks’’, “schedule”, ‘‘seek’’, ‘‘should’’, ‘‘target’’, ‘‘will’’ and similar terms and phrases. There are a number of factors that could affect the future operations of Royal Dutch Shell and could cause those results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements included in this press release, including (without limitation): (a) price fluctuations in crude oil and natural gas; (b) changes in demand for Shell’s products; (c) currency fluctuations; (d) drilling and production results; (e) reserves estimates; (f) loss of market share and industry competition; (g) environmental and physical risks; (h) risks associated with the identification of suitable potential acquisition properties and targets, and successful negotiation and completion of such transactions; (i) the risk of doing business in developing countries and countries subject to international sanctions; (j) legislative, fiscal and regulatory developments including regulatory measures addressing climate change; (k) economic and financial market conditions in various countries and regions; (l) political risks, including the risks of expropriation and renegotiation of the terms of contracts with governmental entities, delays or advancements in the approval of projects and delays in the reimbursement for shared costs; and (m) changes in trading conditions. All forward-looking statements contained in this press release are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section. Readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Additional risk factors that may affect future results are contained in Royal Dutch Shell’s 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 (available at and ). These risk factors also expressly qualify all forward looking statements contained in this press release and should be considered by the reader.  Each forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of this press release 31 May 2013. Neither Royal Dutch Shell plc nor any of its subsidiaries undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement as a result of new information, future events or other information. In light of these risks, results could differ materially from those stated, implied or inferred from the forward-looking statements contained in this press release.